U.S. LEASING v. BIBA INFO. PROC. SERVICES

No. C9-91-1191.

489 N.W.2d 231 (1992)

UNITED STATES LEASING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. BIBA INFORMATION PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. WANG LABORATORIES, INC., Third Party Defendant, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied October 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred Stanbury, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Jeffrey R. Ansel, Winthrop & Weinstine, St. Paul, for Wang Laboratories, Inc.

William G. Cottrell, Daniel Ofstedahl, John Halpern & Associates, Minneapolis, for U.S. Leasing Corp., for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


PER CURIAM.

On petition of defendants Biba Information Processing Services, Inc. and Roger Haro,1 we review only that portion of a split and unpublished decision of the court of appeals reversing the trial court's determination that petitioners' alternative post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial were not timely. We reverse.

Minn.R.Civ.P. 59.03, defining the time for service and hearing of a motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases