Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt his identity as the person who committed the charged offenses is without merit. While the testimony of the complaining witness contained some inconsistencies, these discrepancies did not render his account incredible (see, People v Hainson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.