STATE v. POST

No. 57846-0.

118 Wn.2d 596 (1992)

826 P.2d 172

837 P.2d 599

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CHARLES WILLIAM POST, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

As amended by order September 10, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carney, Stephenson, Badley, Smith & Spellman, P.S., by James E. Lobsenz and John P. Griffin, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, Donna L. Wise, Senior Appellate Attorney, and Jonathan M. Love, Deputy, for respondent.


[As amended by order of the Supreme Court September 10, 1992.]

UTTER, J.

This case arises from the sentence Charles William Post received for first degree rape and burglary convictions in 1988. He received a sentence exceeding the standard range under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), RCW 9.94A. Post's future dangerousness was one of the grounds for his exceptional sentence. As evidence of Post's future dangerousness, the trial court considered Post...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases