THREADGILL, Judge.
Robert Scott appeals from his judgment and sentence following the revocation of his probation. First, he argues that the trial court erred in revoking his probation. We find that the revocation was supported by competent evidence, and we therefore affirm the judgment.
Scott also argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as an habitual offender upon the revocation of his probation. This court in King v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.