1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 417 S.E.2d
  5. 417 S.E.2d 290 (1992)
 

ISMAEL v. GOODMAN TOYOTA

No. 9110DC643.

417 S.E.2d 290 (1992)

106 N.C. App. 421

Khalid ISMAEL, Plaintiff, v. GOODMAN TOYOTA, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moore & Van Allen, by Denise Smith Cline and A. Bailey Nager, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Abraham Penn Jones, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

WELLS, Judge.

On appeal, plaintiff contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in making the following conclusions of law:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW . . . . . 2. Due to the purchase of the subject vehicle in used `as is' condition, the Defendant dealer assumed and bore no responsibility for subsequent repair of the vehicle or its road worthiness. 3. Defendant also bore no responsibility for repairing the vehicle, notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases