EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant argues inter alia that the trial court erred to his prejudice by allowing evidence to be admitted which indicated that the victim had been sexually penetrated. Based on controlling precedent, we agree.
Initially, we note that the State argues that the defendant waived this argument by failing to properly object at trial. However, because we find this evidence was highly prejudicial here and that it affected substantial rights...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
