PEOPLE v. ANCRUM


182 A.D.2d 521 (1992)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marvin Ancrum, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 16, 1992


Defendant's contention that his suppression motion should have been granted is not reviewable on appeal, defendant having waived such review as a condition of his plea agreement (see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 7-10). In any event, were we to undertake such a review, we would find that the lineup was conducted without undue suggestiveness, and that the suppression court did not abuse its discretion in refusing defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases