PATEL v. PLANNING BD.


258 N.J. Super. 437 (1992)

609 A.2d 1319

DR. C. PATEL AND AATHMA, INC., PLAINTIFFS, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

June 18, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon Berkow, for the plaintiffs (Hutt & Berkow, attorneys).

Mark J. Rogoff, for the defendant.


WOLFSON, J.S.C.

The novel issues of statutory interpretation and application which present themselves in this zoning case arise out of the voting eligibility requirements embodied in the New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 et seq.

In July, 1991, plaintiffs applied to the Woodbridge Township Planning Board for minor site plan approval with ancillary bulk variances to permit a retail store along the southbound frontage of Route...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases