STATE v. ONEFREY

No. 58128-2.

119 Wn.2d 572 (1992)

835 P.2d 213

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JACK ALLEN ONEFREY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 3, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mestel & Muenster, by John R. Muenster, for appellant.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, Theresa Fricke, Senior Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael E. Shaw, Deputy, for respondent.


DURHAM, J.

Jack Onefrey appeals his standard range sentence of 36 months for indecent liberties and child molestation. He contends that the trial court incorrectly interpreted the special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA), and erroneously denied him the opportunity for treatment rather than a prison term. We affirm.

Onefrey pleaded guilty to two counts of indecent liberties and one count of child molestation. Onefrey molested the child of a neighbor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases