1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 181 A.D.2d
  5. 181 A.D.2d 501 (1992)
 

MESTEL & CO., INC. v. SMYTHE, MASTERSON & JUDD, MANDA WEINTRAUB

181 A.D.2d 501 (1992)

Mestel & Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Smythe, Masterson & Judd, Manda Weintraub et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 12, 1992

The IAS court's denial of plaintiff's cross motion for renewal was not an abuse of discretion. The motion was not supported by new facts that could not have readily and with due diligence been made part of the original motion, and plaintiff failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the additional facts on the original motion (Matter of Beiny, 132 A.D.2d 190, 210, lv dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases