MATTER OF DEPENDENCY OF M.A.

No. 27809-6-I.

66 Wn. App. 614 (1992)

834 P.2d 627

In the Matter of the Dependency of M.A. THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent, v. MICHAEL AKRISH, SR., Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

July 27, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Virginia L. Marshall of Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons and Mary Jane Ferguson of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellant.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Mary Ann Comiskey, Assistant, for respondent.

Lori L. Irwin, as guardian ad litem.


AGID, J.

Michael Akrish appeals a dependency review order removing his son, M.A., from the family home. He contends that none of the statutory conditions for removal provided in RCW 13.34.130(1)(b) was present and that the State failed to provide the court with a dispositional plan as required under RCW 13.34.130(3). We conclude that the dependency review order is not appealable as a matter of right and deny discretionary review pursuant to RAP 2.3.

I

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases