MICHIGAN MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
BRONSON PLATING COMPANY
Michigan Court of Appeals.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 21, 1992, at 9:10 A.M.
Decided December 21, 1992, at 9:10 A.M.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Willingham & Cote, P.C. (by John A. Yeager and Anthony S. Kogut), for Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company.
Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn (by Jay E. Brant, Philip A. Grashoff, Jr., and Mark A. Goldsmith) (Biringer, Hutchinson & Van Doren, P.C., by Richard F. Biringer, of Counsel), for Bronson Plating Company.
Sullivan, Ward, Bone, Tyler & Asher, P.C. (by Michelle A. Thomas and Thomas M. Slavin), for Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company.
Franklin, Bigler, Berry & Johnston (by Steven C. Berry), for Hamilton Mutual Insurance Company.
Schureman, Frakes, Glass & Wulfmeier (by Steven M. Hickey), for Commercial Union Insurance Company.
Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, P.C. (by Marcia L. Howe), for Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company.
Howard & Howard, P.C. (by Myra L. Willis), for Auto-Owners Insurance Company.
Kitch, Saurbier, Drutchas, Wagner & Kenney, P.C. (by Stephen M. Kelley,), for Indiana Insurance Company.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by Michael B. Ortega), for Federal Insurance Company.
Morrison, Morrison & Finley (by Kenneth W. Morrison), for Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company.
Beresh & Prokopp (by Sandra A. Prokopp), for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.
Amicus Curiae:
Proviser, Lichtenstein, Pearlman & Phillips, P.C. (by Randall E. Phillips) (Wiley, Rein & Fielding, by Thomas W. Brunner, James M. Johnstone, James P. Anasiewicz, and Frederick S. Ansell, of Counsel), for Insurance Environmental Litigation Association.
Before: WAHLS, P.J., and MARILYN KELLY and REILLY, JJ.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
WAHLS, P.J.
In this declaratory judgment action, defendant Bronson Plating Company appeals as of right from an order of the Branch Circuit Court that denied reconsideration of its earlier bench opinion and granted summary disposition to plaintiff Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company and the other insurers involved in the case, apparently pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). The trial court held that Michigan Millers and the other insurers had no duty to defend or indemnify...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
