Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the police testimony at the suppression hearing had the appearance of being patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections and therefore, should not have been credited. We disagree. It is well settled that the determination of the suppression court, with its advantages of having seen and heard the witnesses, must be
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
