In this trial for burglary, the trial court properly excluded a statement allegedly made to the police by the codefendant (who was not jointly tried with defendant), that she had permission to enter the apartment. The codefendant's statement was made after she and defendant had exited the burglarized apartment, and thus was not relevant to defendant's state of mind when he entered the apartment. We have considered the remaining arguments, including those raised in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
