HOLLAND v. NeSMITH

1901509.

593 So.2d 82 (1992)

Thurston HOLLAND v. Darryl McCoy NeSMITH.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 31, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael F. Terry of Speake & Speake, Moulton, for appellant.

Rod M. Alexander, Moulton, for appellee.


INGRAM, Justice.

Darryl McCoy NeSmith sued Thurston Holland, seeking to have the trial court establish a boundary line between two adjacent parcels of land, one of which is owned by NeSmith and the other by Holland. Following an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court ruled for NeSmith, and Holland appealed.

On appeal, Holland raises only the issue of whether the trial court's judgment is clearly erroneous, manifestly unjust, and contrary to the evidence.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases