FURMAN v. A.B.E. INDUS. ASSOCS.


182 A.D.2d 493 (1992)

Jay Furman et al., Appellants, v. A.B.E. Industrial Associates et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 14, 1992


"A letter may be considered an instrument for the payment of money only, pursuant to CPLR 3213, so long as the writing unconditionally acknowledges a debt (Maglich v Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, 97 A.D.2d 19)." (Blum, Gersen & Stream v 346 E. 72nd St. Assocs., 172 A.D.2d 444.) Nevertheless, we affirm, since defendants' opposition raises issues of fact as to the circumstances surrounding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases