STATE v. PATTON


256 N.J. Super. 413 (1992)

607 A.2d 191

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MILTON OCTAVIUS PATTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 19, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Holzapfel argued the cause for appellant (LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, attorneys; William R. Holzapfel, Daniel J. McCarthy, Ellen B. Silverman and Elizabeth J. Gorman, on the brief).

Barbara A. Rosenkrans, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (James F. Mulvihill, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, submitted a brief amicus curiae (Ronald Susswein, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, BRODY and LANDAU.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, P.J.A.D.

We hold here that defendant's assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination bars his disorderly persons conviction under N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10c:

Any person who knowingly obtains or possesses a controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog in violation of [N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10a, prohibiting possession of any controlled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases