Evidence at trial was that a police officer, stationed at a rooftop observation post with binoculars, observed defendant on the street below make five separate sales of heroin to five different apprehended purchasers within a period of approximately two hours.
Defendant's claim on appeal that the trial court's marshaling of the evidence was unbalanced and favorable to the People is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
