1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 183 A.D.2d
  5. 183 A.D.2d 483 (1992)
 

ACOSTA v. FUENTES

183 A.D.2d 483 (1992)

Ermelinda Acosta, as Administratrix of The Estate of Luis Acosta, Deceased, Respondent, v. Alfredo Fuentes et al., Doing Business as La Perla Cuchifrito, et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 12, 1992

Both the original summary judgment motion and defendants' opposition to plaintiff's motion to reargue were submitted upon attorney affidavits, with no affidavits from persons having actual knowledge of the events. Parties moving for summary judgment are obligated to prove through admissible evidence that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law (Pastoriza v State of New York, 108 A.D.2d 605

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases