Petitioner asserts that even though his applications were not filed in a timely manner, the doctrine of estoppel should be applied against respondents. However, even if respondents gave petitioner an additional year to file his application, as petitioner claims, he failed to file his application within that year. In fact, petitioner did not file his application until 3 years later. Accordingly, there is no estoppel under these circumstances. Moreover, petitioner has failed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
