Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the sentencing court's unilateral imposition of an enhanced term based on his failure to appear on the original sentencing date constituted legal error. However, inasmuch as the defendant did not advance this issue at the sentencing by objecting to the enhanced term or moving to withdraw his plea, he has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review (see, People v Polansky,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.