SEDA v. NEW YORK CITY HOUS. AUTH.


181 A.D.2d 469 (1992)

Raul Seda et al., Respondents, v. New York City Housing Authority, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 10, 1992


Although defendant New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) waited more than three years to raise the defense of Statute of Limitations, leave to amend pleadings is to be freely given absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay (Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 N.Y.2d 934, 935). Plaintiff admits that there has been a dearth of discovery to date. The absence of substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases