STATE v. ROSE

Nos. 91-1458 and 91-1591.

63 Ohio St.3d 585 (1992)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROSE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald W. White, Prosecuting Attorney, and David Henry Hoffmann, for appellant.

R. Daniel Dannon, County Public Defender, and Kendra L. Daugherty, for appellee.


HOLMES, J.

The issue certified to this court is whether a defendant can be convicted of R.C. 2913.03, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, where the defendant's possession or use was initially authorized by the owner of the vehicle, but possession or use thereafter extended beyond the scope of the owner's consent. For the reasons that follow, we answer such query in the affirmative.

R.C. 2913.03 provides:

"(A) No person shall knowingly use or operate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases