PROBST v. BOARD OF EDUC.


127 N.J. 518 (1992)

606 A.2d 345

PAMELA PROBST, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD, CAMDEN COUNTY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 19, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph F. Betley argued the cause for appellant (Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys; Alan R. Schmoll, of counsel).

Kenneth A. Sandler argued the cause for respondent (Selikoff & Cohen, attorneys; Joel S. Selikoff, of counsel).

Richard A. Friedman submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey Education Association (Zazzali, Zazzali, Fagella & Nowak, attorneys).

Marlene Zuberman submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of the State Board of Education.

Donna M. Kaye, Associate Counsel, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey School Boards Association (Sheila Dow-Ford, Director, attorney).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

This appeal concerns the interplay between two statutes, N.J.S.A. 18A:29-4.1 (Section 4.1) and N.J.S.A. 18A:29-14 (Section 14), which address salaries for public-school teachers.

Section 4.1 allows local school boards to adopt binding salary schedules outlining compensation for teachers for periods of up to three school years. The guides place teachers at varying steps according to their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases