PATTERSON v. V & M AUTO BODY

No. 91-552.

63 Ohio St.3d 573 (1992)

PATTERSON, APPELLANT, v. V & M AUTO BODY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joan L. Turner, for appellant.

Richards & Meola, Charles L. Richards and Jeffrey v. Goodman, for appellee.


HERBERT R. BROWN, J.

In this case we are asked to decide whether a lawsuit may be knowingly maintained against a defendant solely under the fictitious name in which the defendant does business. For the following reasons, we hold that it may not.

It is well established that both plaintiff and defendant in a lawsuit must be legal entities with the capacity to be sued. Cf. Civ.R. 17(B); Barnhart v. Schultz (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 59...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases