1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 172 Ariz.
  5. 172 Ariz. 461 (1992)
 

CIENFUEGOS v. SUPERIOR COURT

Nos. 1 CA-SA 91-302, 1 CA-SA 92-049 and 1 CA-SA 92-095.

172 Ariz. 461 (1992)

837 P.2d 1196

Adeline N. CIENFUEGOS, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, in and for the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Jeffrey A. Hotham, a judge thereof, Respondent. and The STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Richard M. ROMLEY, Maricopa County Attorney, Real Party in Interest. Calvin COKER, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, in and for the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Rufus C. Coulter, a judge thereof, Respondent. STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Richard M. ROMLEY, Maricopa County Attorney, Real Party in Interest. Kenny W. EARLY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, in and for the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, and the Honorable Jeffrey A. Hotham, Respondent. and The STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Richard M. ROMLEY, Maricopa County Attorney, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Review Denied October 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean W. Trebesch, Maricopa County Public Defender by Albert H. Duncan, Lisa A. Gilels and Carol Scott Berry, Deputy Public Defenders, Phoenix, for petitioners.

Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Atty. by Gerald N. Grant, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for real party in interest.

OPINION

MELVYN T. SHELLEY, Judge.*

We have previously accepted jurisdiction in Adeline M. Cienfuegos' special action, with this opinion to follow. We now accept jurisdiction in the special actions filed by Calvin Coker and Kenny W. Early. The issue presented in these consolidated cases has arisen in numerous criminal actions and has been the subject of conflicting rulings by different trial judges. Relief by special action is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases