Contrary to defendant's contention, the People established beyond a reasonable doubt that when defendant sold narcotics to an undercover officer he acted with the requisite mental intent. The testimony of the undercover officers demonstrated defendant initiated the narcotics transaction, and exhibited both an independent interest in promoting the transaction and salesmanlike behavior (see, People v Seay,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PANTOJA
188 A.D.2d 437 (1992)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Miguel Pantoja, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 29, 1992
December 29, 1992
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.