ALTERMAN v. PROVIZER, EISENBERG, LICHTENSTEIN & PEARLMAN

Docket No. 137322.

195 Mich. App. 422 (1992)

491 N.W.2d 868

ALTERMAN v. PROVIZER, EISENBERG, LICHTENSTEIN & PEARLMAN, PC

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided August 4, 1992, at 9:05 A.M.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Schouman, for the plaintiff.

Collins, Einhorn & Farrell, P.C. (by Morton H. Collins and Theresa M. Asoklis), for the defendants.

Before: FITZGERALD, P.J., and HOOD and J.C. KINGSLEY, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal as of right from the trial court's order granting summary disposition to defendants of plaintiff's legal malpractice claim. At issue is the trial court's application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel. See MCR 2.116(C)(7). We affirm.

Plaintiff suffered a work-related injury in 1986 and sued his employer, a railroad company, in federal court. On defendant Pearlman's advice, he settled that case and agreed to resign from his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases