1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St.3d 552 (1992)
 

VANCE v. ROEDERSHEIMER

No. 91-1323.

64 Ohio St.3d 552 (1992)

VANCE ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. ROEDERSHEIMER, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 2, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Hensley, Jr., for appellants and cross-appellees.

John A. Smalley and Kenneth J. Ignozzi, for appellee and cross-appellant.

HERBERT R. BROWN, J.

The issue before us in this case is the enforceability of Loc.R. 2.53(Z). For the reasons which follow, we affirm the holdings, but not the reasoning, of the court of appeals.

Direct Appeal

Courts of this state are entitled to adopt rules of local practice. However, under Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, Civ.R. 83 and C.P.Sup.R. 9(C),4

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases