STATE v. BALE

No. C2-92-894.

493 N.W.2d 123 (1992)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Michael Howard BALE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul and Raymond F. Schmitz, Olmsted County Atty., Rochester, for respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender and Evan W. Jones, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and HUSPENI and NORTON, JJ.


NORTON, Judge.

OPINION

Michael Howard Bale appeals from his sentence of 288 months, arguing that the record contains insufficient findings to support a departure under the patterned sex offender statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.1352 (1990). We affirm.

FACTS

Michael Howard Bale pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree. Minn.Stat. § 609.344 (1990). Appellant did not challenge the underlying facts of one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases