HOSEK v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. F017868.

10 Cal.App.4th 605 (1992)

12 Cal. Rptr.2d 650

CINDY LEE HOSEK, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUOLUMNE COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

October 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Steven G. Mikelich for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Karen L. Ziskind and James T. McNally, Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

VARTABEDIAN, J.

In Whitman v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 1063 [2 Cal.Rptr. 160, 820 P.2d 262], the Supreme Court held that at a preliminary examination conducted pursuant to Penal Code section 8721 an investigating officer is permitted to testify to hearsay statements he has gathered in the course of his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases