1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 118 Wn.2d
  5. 118 Wn.2d 488 (1992)
 

FRIENDS v. BOUNDARY REVIEW BD.

No. 57621-1.

118 Wn.2d 488 (1992)

825 P.2d 300

FRIENDS OF SNOQUALMIE VALLEY, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Richard Aramburu, for appellants.

Robert C. Kaufman, for respondent Boundary Review Board.

Thomas, Whittington, Anderson, Bergan, Studebaker & Tuttle and Patrick B. Anderson (Peter L. Buck, Jay P. Derr, Madeleine A.F. Brenner and Buck & Gordon, of counsel), for respondent Snoqualmie.

Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S., by Jerome L. Hillis, Mark C. McPherson, and Lynne M. Cohee, for respondents Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Co., et al.

Perkins Coie, by Omar S. Parker, Jr., and R. Gerard Lutz, for respondents Puget Western, Inc., et al.

GUY, J.

Friends of Snoqualmie Valley and several property owners (appellants) appeal from a superior court judgment affirming the King County Boundary Review Board's approval of an annexation by the City of Snoqualmie. The appellants claim the annexation decision failed to achieve required statutory objectives. They also contend the Boundary Review Board's action was invalid, as it failed to comply with State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA) requirements for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases