SZOKE v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT


260 N.J. Super. 341 (1992)

616 A.2d 942

WAYNE SZOKE AND CAROL SZOKE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF MONMOUTH BEACH AND ROBERT HOLDEN AND SHARON HOLDEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 25, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evan L. Goldman argued the cause for appellants (Levinson, Axelrod, Wheaton & Grayzel, attorneys; Mr. Goldman and Steven M. Hambro, on the brief).

Thomas J. Smith, III argued the cause for respondents Robert Holden and Sharon Holden (Smith, Shaw, Smith & Oxley, attorneys; Mr. Smith, on the brief).

Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys for respondent The Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Monmouth Beach, filed a Statement in Lieu of Brief (Anthony R. Caruso, of counsel; Lisa A. Butto, on the Statement).

Before Judges BILDER, BAIME and WALLACE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BILDER, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by abutting objecting landowners from an order of the Law Division upholding a determination of the Monmouth Beach Zoning Board of Adjustment granting defendants Robert and Sharon Holden a minor subdivision of their existing residential property which lies within two zones and also granting the lot owners' application for use and bulk variances to permit the construction of a second residential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases