BERKOWITZ v. HAIGOOD


256 N.J. Super. 342 (1992)

606 A.2d 1157

ROBERT G. BERKOWITZ, PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH HAIGOOD AND JAMES NICHOLS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Middlesex County.

Decided March 12, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Berkowitz, pro se, Plaintiff.

James Nichols, Esq., pro se, Defendant.


MATHIAS E. RODRIGUEZ, J.S.C.

The plaintiff, Robert G. Berkowitz is a chiropractic doctor, who brought an action against his patient, Joseph Haigood, and his patient's attorney, James Nichols, for the payment of medical bills. Judgment by default has been granted against Mr. Haigood.

Both remaining parties, Dr. Berkowitz and Mr. Nichols, move for summary judgment. The issue to be determined is whether an attorney-at-law is personally liable to the medical provider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases