There is no merit to petitioner's argument that it was deprived of due process because it was not given notice of the proceeding and not afforded a hearing to challenge the tenant's allegations. Although all of respondent's notices to petitioner were sent to the same address, petitioner responded only when informed of an adverse decision, and thus its suggestion that its mail went undelivered after it had changed its business address is unconvincing. In any event, respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
