GRAND v. CIGNA PROPERTY AND CAS.

No. 2 CA-CV 91-0163.

172 Ariz. 419 (1992)

837 P.2d 1154

Richard D. GRAND, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CIGNA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES, a corporation, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Review Denied October 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard A. Kashman, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

Thomas, Burke & Phillips, P.C. by Benjamin C. Thomas and Thomas P. Burke, II, Phoenix, for defendant/appellee.


OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Richard Grand contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on the basis of collateral estoppel to appellee Cigna Property and Casualty Companies on his breach of contract and bad faith claims. He also contends that the trial court erred in awarding Cigna attorney's fees. Grand argues that fact questions are present on the issue of whether Cigna's office building package insurance policy covers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases