1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 26 Conn.
  5. 26 Conn. App. 564 (1992)
 

NOROOZ v. INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY

(10148)

26 Conn. App. 564 (1992)

SEDIGHEH NOROOZ ET AL. v. INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY OF THE TOWN OF WOODBURY ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released February 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maureen Danehy Cox, with whom, on the brief, was William F. Holland, for the appellant (named defendant).

David B. Harting, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

DUPONT, C. J., O'CONNELL and LAVERY, JS.

DUPONT, C. J.

The named defendant1 Woodbury inland wetlands agency appeals from the decision of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs'2 appeal from the denial of their permit application by the inland wetlands agency. The trial court concluded that the agency decision must be set aside because it was based on extrarecord information, that is, material not presented to the agency at a public hearing. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases