TAING v. JOHNSON SCAFFOLDING CO.

Docket No. A054965.

9 Cal.App.4th 579 (1992)

11 Cal. Rptr.2d 820

MENG TAING et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JOHNSON SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Intervener and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

September 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wild & Zaragoza, Paul D. Fife and Donald R. Wild for Defendant and Appellant.

Bianco, Brandi & Murphy and Stephen M. Murphy for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

McDonald, Cullom & Burland, Jacob Burland and Sally A. Keane for Defendants and Respondents.

Hanna, Brophy, MacLean, McAleer & Jensen, John L. Armanino and Marianne F. Tancor for Intervener and Respondent.


[Opinion certified for partial publication.]

OPINION

HANING, Acting P.J.

Defendant/appellant Johnson Scaffolding Company appeals a judgment by jury trial in favor of plaintiff/respondent Meng Taing (Taing) et al.1 in Taing's action for personal injuries suffered in a construction accident. Appellant contends the judgment is not supported by substantial evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases