CORP v. ARCO

No. 26220-3-I.

67 Wn. App. 520 (1992)

837 P.2d 1030

CRAIG D. CORP, ET AL, Plaintiffs, BOB VERNON, ET AL, Appellants, v. ATLANTIC-RICHFIELD COMPANY, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 5, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl A. Taylor Lopez and Lopez & Fantel, Inc., P.S., for appellants.

Douglas C. Berry and Graham & Dunn, for respondent.


PEKELIS, J.

This case involves an action brought by 12 convenience store operators against Atlantic-Richfield Company (ARCO) for alleged violations of Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA), RCW 19.100. Appellants challenge a series of pretrial rulings which resulted in the entry of a final judgment in favor of ARCO. They contend that the trial court erred in (1) determining as a matter of law that ARCO had neither terminated nor failed to renew their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases