STATE, EX REL. ROLLING HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN., v. BROWN

No. 91-1339.

63 Ohio St.3d 520 (1992)

THE STATE, EX REL. ROLLING HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. BROWN CTY. AUDITOR, ET AL. APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 29, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warhola, Heine & Ferguson, Andrew J. Warhola, Jr.; Warhola, O'Toole, Loughman, Alderman & Stumphauzer and Kenneth S. Stumphauzer, for appellant.

C. Keith Plummer, Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Guernsey County Auditor.

Teaford, Rich, Coffman & Wheeler and Jeffrey A. Rich, for appellee Cambridge City School District Board of Education.


Per Curiam.

Appellees argue that Rolling Hills could file a complaint under R.C. 5715.19 to challenge the assessment of these parcels and, therefore, have an adequate remedy at law. Rolling Hills replies that this statute is not as broad as appellees maintain. Rolling Hills replies that a board of education may contest only the current value of the property under the statute. We agree with appellees.

R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases