FARM CREDIT BANK v. AHRENSTORFF

No. C6-91-581.

479 N.W.2d 102 (1992)

FARM CREDIT BANK OF ST. PAUL, Appellant, v. Sigfried AHRENSTORFF, Marlis M. Ahrenstorff, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 27, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Thomas Wilson, Reed H. Glawe, Gislason, Dosland, Hunter & Malecki, New Ulm, for Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul.

Laurence B. Hughes, William J. Wetering, Hedeen, Hughes & Wetering, Worthington, for Sigfried Ahrenstorff.

Hans K. Carlson, Muir, Costello & Carlson, Jackson, and Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul A. Strandberg, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for Marlis M. Ahrenstorff, et al.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and FORSBERG and KALITOWSKI, JJ.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul appeals from judgment dismissing its deficiency judgment action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court decided that a 90 day limitations period barred the action for a deficiency judgment even though the foreclosure sale that created the deficiency was held before the statute that established the limitations period was enacted. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On May 25...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases