1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 186 A.D.2d
  5. 186 A.D.2d 392 (1992)
 

PEOPLE v. VELEZ

186 A.D.2d 392 (1992)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ramon Velez, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 8, 1992

Since defendant never objected to the trial court's supplemental instructions, his contention on appeal that they were erroneous and inadequate and expressed hostility and impatience with the jury's questions is unpreserved for review (People v Gruttola, 43 N.Y.2d 116, 123). In any event, were we to review in the interest of justice, we would find that the court's responses were appropriate.

Defendant contends, inter alia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases