Since defendant never requested a CPL 60.35 (2) charge that a prior inconsistent statement should only be used for impeachment purposes, either before or after jury instructions were given, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bowen,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.