STATE EX REL. BRADFORD v. TRUMBULL CTY. COURT

No. 91-1000.

64 Ohio St.3d 502 (1992)

THE STATE EX REL. BRADFORD, APPELLANT, v. TRUMBULL COUNTY COURT ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 2, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Lutseck, for appellant.

Dennis Watkins, Prosecuting Attorney, and James Misocky, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

For a writ of prohibition to issue, the respondent must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, the exercise of that power must be unauthorized by law, and refusal of the writ must result in injury for which no other adequate legal remedy exists. State ex rel. Columbus S. Power Co. v. Sheward (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 78, 79, 585 N.E.2d 380, 381.

I

Appellant argues in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases