1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 256 N.J.
  5. 256 N.J. Super. 309 (1992)
 

STRUMPH v. SCHERING CORP.

256 N.J. Super. 309 (1992)

606 A.2d 1140

NANCY STRUMPH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SCHERING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

May 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack E. Milkis attorney for appellant (Earl G. Kauffman, admitted pro hac vice; Jack E. Milkis, on the brief).

Dughi and Hewit, attorneys for respondent (Russell L. Hewit and Mary Elizabeth Gazi, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, SKILLMAN and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

This is a product liability action against Schering Corporation, the manufacturer of a drug marketed under the name Trilafon. Plaintiff, Nancy Strumph, alleges that she developed neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) as a result of her ingestion of Trilafon, a neuroleptic drug, which had been prescribed by her treating physician. Schering's liability is posited on the contention that it did not adequately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases