IN INTEREST OF A.P.


421 Pa.Super. 141 (1992)

617 A.2d 764

In the Interest of A.P. Appeal of A.P.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed December 7, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley S. Bridge, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Alan Sacks, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for Com., participating party.

Before ROWLEY, President Judge, and WIEAND, CIRILLO, OLSZEWSKI, MONTEMURO, POPOVICH, JOHNSON, HUDOCK and FORD ELLIOTT, JJ.


HUDOCK, Judge:

The question which brings this matter to this Court en banc is: What means, if any, are available to a juvenile to perfect his constitutional right to appellate review of a disposition order when his counsel was ineffective in failing to file a direct appeal, and relief is unavailable under the Post Conviction Relief Act?1

This appeal comes to us as an appeal from an order denying Appellant's (A.P.'s) motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases