Petitioner, a firearms instructor at the police firing range, claims to have suffered ear damage as a result of his duties. The IAS court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner leave to file a late notice of claim, since "the facts upon which [respondent's] liability is predicated are not discernable" from the line-of-duty report, aided card, and witness statements submitted by petitioner (Matter of McLoughlin v City of New York,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
