ESDAILE v. ANGLE


126 N.J. 426 (1992)

599 A.2d 1254

LAVERNE ESDAILE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM G. ANGLE, WINZEL HARTSFIELD, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, BILL REED, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS THE TURF LOUNGE, THE TURF LOUNGE, AND THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM REED, TWELVE HUNDRED LAKE AVENUE CORPORATION, TRADING AS THE TURF MELODY LOUNGE, AND STEVEN DOES, FICTITIOUS NAMES WHOSE TRUE NAMES ARE PRESENTLY UNKNOWN, DEFENDANTS, AND HAZEL FRANK GLUCK, ON BEHALF OF THE UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 7, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley S. Spector argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Shechet & Spector, attorneys).

Richard J. Mirra argued the cause for respondent (Boglioli & O'Mara, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge D'Annunzio's dissent. See Esdaile v. Hartsfield, 245 N.J.Super. 591, 600-02, 586 A.2d 334 (1991). In doing so we imply no position on whether a recipient of payments in the nature of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Fund...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases