FISHER v. OHIO UNIVERSITY

No. 91-385.

63 Ohio St.3d 484 (1992)

FISHER, APPELLEE, v. OHIO UNIVERSITY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald R. Gilbert, Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and David J. Elk, for appellee.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Sheryl Creed Maxfield, for appellant.

Licata & Crosby Co., L.P.A., Louis J. Licata and William M. Crosby, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Adult Support for Incest Survivors of Today.


MOYER, C.J.

The sole issue before this court is whether the Court of Claims' grant of the university's motion for summary judgment was proper. It is undisputed that the statute of limitations governing plaintiff's claim is R.C. 2743.16(A). Fisher had two years from the date of the accident to file his complaint. The complaint was filed twenty days after the limitations period expired. Fisher's action would be timely only if the time for filing was tolled pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases