1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 188 A.D.2d
  5. 188 A.D.2d 357 (1992)
 

ICD GROUP, INC. v. PROAROMA INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO, LTDA.

188 A.D.2d 357 (1992)

Icd Group, Inc., Appellant, v. Proaroma Industria Y Comercio, Ltda., Defendant, and Craig M. Firestone et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 10, 1992

No basis exists to disturb the court's finding that neither defendant Firestone nor Palliser had authority to bind their respective principals, plaintiff ICD and defendant Proaroma, when they executed an agreement purporting to make ICD the exclusive US distributor of Proaroma's fumaric acid. "On a bench trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed upon appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases